Fillout vs SmartRecruiters
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Fillout and SmartRecruiters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
SmartRecruiters (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 37). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SmartRecruiters is clearly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), SmartRecruiters is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is ahead of SmartRecruiters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SmartRecruiters is clearly ahead of Fillout. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is ahead of SmartRecruiters.
Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. SmartRecruiters shows 119 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but SmartRecruiters's footprint is roughly 59.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. SmartRecruiters looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Fillout | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 40 |
| Code | 34 | 56 |
| Education | 53 | 65 |
| Community | 27 | 12 |
| Reach | 50 | 76 |
| Momentum | 15 | 6 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2 | 119 |
| Forks | 4 | 17 |
| Public repos | 9 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 37 |