Fillout vs Spreedly

Fillout and Spreedly (Simple and secure PCI compliance and payment forwarding.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Spreedly (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 30). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Spreedly is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fillout is slightly ahead of Spreedly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Spreedly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of Spreedly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Spreedly is slightly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Spreedly shows 418 stars across 67 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Spreedly's footprint is roughly 209.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Spreedly looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.