Fillout vs Perk

Fillout and Perk (We're fixing business travel.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Perk (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 37). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Perk is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Perk is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Perk is ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of Perk. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Perk is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Perk shows 34 stars across 25 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Perk's footprint is roughly 17.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Perk looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.