Fillout vs Typeform

Fillout and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 37). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fillout is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is slightly ahead of Typeform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Typeform's footprint is roughly 295.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.