Fillout vs UptimeRobot

Fillout and UptimeRobot (Leading Uptime Monitoring Service) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout and UptimeRobot sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (37), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), UptimeRobot is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UptimeRobot is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UptimeRobot is slightly ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of UptimeRobot. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UptimeRobot is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. UptimeRobot shows 81 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but UptimeRobot's footprint is roughly 40.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. UptimeRobot looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.