Fillout vs The Washington Post

Fillout and The Washington Post both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout and The Washington Post sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (37), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), The Washington Post is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fillout is slightly ahead of The Washington Post. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is ahead of The Washington Post. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), The Washington Post is slightly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. The Washington Post shows 2,751 stars across 91 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but The Washington Post's footprint is roughly 1375.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. The Washington Post looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.