Fillout vs Workable

Fillout and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 35). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Workable is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Workable is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of Workable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Workable is ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Workable's footprint is roughly 392.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Workable looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.