Fillout vs Yext
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Fillout and Yext both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Fillout and Yext sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (37), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Yext is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fillout is slightly ahead of Yext. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Yext. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Yext. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Yext is ahead of Fillout.
Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Yext shows 296 stars across 171 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Yext's footprint is roughly 148.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Yext looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Fillout | Yext |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 37 |
| Code | 34 | 54 |
| Education | 53 | 48 |
| Community | 27 | 25 |
| Reach | 50 | 21 |
| Momentum | 15 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2 | 296 |
| Forks | 4 | 117 |
| Public repos | 9 | 171 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 12 |
| External contributors | 3 | 9 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 43 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 46 |