Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Fillout vs Yext

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Fillout and Yext both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout and Yext sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (37), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Yext is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fillout is slightly ahead of Yext. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Yext. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Yext. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Yext is ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Yext shows 296 stars across 171 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Yext's footprint is roughly 148.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Yext looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricFilloutYext
Ranking
Overall rank#510#510
Pillars
Overall3737
Code3454
Education5348
Community2725
Reach5021
Momentum1524
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars2296
Forks4117
Public repos9171
Active repos (90d)312
External contributors39
Avg polish3443
Avg AI-readiness2146

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Fillout developer profileView Yext developer profile