Web data API for AI
Firecrawl vs litellm
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Firecrawl (Web data API for AI) and litellm both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Firecrawl (rank #122) holds a meaningful lead over litellm (rank #1114) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 7). The gap of 47 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Firecrawl is clearly ahead of litellm. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Firecrawl is clearly ahead of litellm. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Firecrawl is clearly ahead of litellm. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), litellm is ahead of Firecrawl. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Firecrawl is clearly ahead of litellm.
Firecrawl carries 199,181 GitHub stars across 101 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 130 external contributors on record. litellm shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Firecrawl is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. litellm looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Firecrawl | litellm |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #122 | #1114 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 54 | 7 |
| Code | 48 | 0 |
| Education | 87 | 0 |
| Community | 52 | 0 |
| Reach | 27 | 40 |
| Momentum | 37 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 199,181 | 0 |
| Forks | 17,907 | 0 |
| Public repos | 101 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 0 |
| External contributors | 130 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 0 |