Fivetran vs Starling Bank

Fivetran and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fivetran (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Fivetran is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Starling Bank is ahead of Fivetran. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fivetran is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Fivetran. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fivetran is slightly ahead of Starling Bank.

Fivetran carries 13,433 GitHub stars across 314 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 40 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Fivetran's footprint is roughly 68.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fivetran is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.