Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Flexport vs Hotjar

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Flexport (We're fixing the user experience in global trade. Join us!) and Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Hotjar (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Flexport (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 33). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is ahead of Flexport. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is ahead of Flexport. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Flexport. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Flexport. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Hotjar is ahead of Flexport.

Flexport carries 145 GitHub stars across 69 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Hotjar shows 52 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.

Flexport is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Hotjar looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricFlexportHotjar
Ranking
Overall rank#625#317
Pillars
Overall3344
Code4456
Education6888
Community1522
Reach5562
Momentum824
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars14552
Forks7110
Public repos692
Active repos (90d)41
External contributors22
Avg polish3245
Avg AI-readiness3960

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Flexport developer profileView Hotjar developer profile