Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Flexport vs Starling Bank

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Flexport (We're fixing the user experience in global trade. Join us!) and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Starling Bank (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Flexport (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 32). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Flexport. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Flexport is ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Flexport is slightly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Flexport. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Flexport.

Flexport carries 145 GitHub stars across 69 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Flexport is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Starling Bank looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricFlexportStarling Bank
Ranking
Overall rank#668#625
Pillars
Overall3233
Code4450
Education6855
Community139
Reach5563
Momentum648
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars145195
Forks7029
Public repos693
Active repos (90d)33
External contributors10
Avg polish3258
Avg AI-readiness3914

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Flexport developer profileView Starling Bank developer profile