We're fixing the user experience in global trade. Join us!
Flexport vs Tealium Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Flexport (We're fixing the user experience in global trade. Join us!) and Tealium Inc. (Tealium is the data hub for digital business.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Tealium Inc. (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Flexport (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 33). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Flexport is ahead of Tealium Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Flexport is clearly ahead of Tealium Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Tealium Inc. is clearly ahead of Flexport. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Flexport is clearly ahead of Tealium Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Tealium Inc. is clearly ahead of Flexport.
Flexport carries 145 GitHub stars across 69 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Tealium Inc. shows 212 stars across 130 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Flexport is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Tealium Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Flexport | Tealium Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 40 |
| Code | 44 | 34 |
| Education | 68 | 40 |
| Community | 15 | 62 |
| Reach | 55 | 16 |
| Momentum | 8 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 145 | 212 |
| Forks | 71 | 231 |
| Public repos | 69 | 130 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 13 |
| External contributors | 2 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 32 | 43 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 27 |