Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.
ForestAdmin vs InVision
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ForestAdmin (Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.) and InVision both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ForestAdmin (rank #165) holds a modest lead over InVision (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 40). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ForestAdmin is ahead of InVision. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), InVision is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ForestAdmin is ahead of InVision. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), InVision is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ForestAdmin is clearly ahead of InVision.
ForestAdmin carries 3,415 GitHub stars across 87 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors on record. InVision shows 1,303 stars across 114 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
ForestAdmin is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. InVision looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ForestAdmin | InVision |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 40 |
| Code | 66 | 46 |
| Education | 74 | 80 |
| Community | 28 | 14 |
| Reach | 35 | 40 |
| Momentum | 27 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,415 | 1,303 |
| Forks | 360 | 193 |
| Public repos | 87 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 0 |
| External contributors | 9 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 64 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 34 |