ForestAdmin vs Metabase

ForestAdmin (Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.) and Metabase both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ForestAdmin and Metabase sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (51), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ForestAdmin is ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Metabase is ahead of ForestAdmin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is clearly ahead of ForestAdmin.

ForestAdmin carries 3,415 GitHub stars across 87 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors on record. Metabase shows 50,225 stars across 100 public repos, 21 active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 14.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ForestAdmin is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Metabase looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.