ForestAdmin vs Qualtrics

ForestAdmin (Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.) and Qualtrics both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ForestAdmin (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Qualtrics (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 31). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ForestAdmin is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ForestAdmin is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ForestAdmin is ahead of Qualtrics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qualtrics is clearly ahead of ForestAdmin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ForestAdmin is ahead of Qualtrics.

ForestAdmin carries 3,415 GitHub stars across 87 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors on record. Qualtrics shows 20 stars across 20 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ForestAdmin's footprint is roughly 170.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ForestAdmin is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Qualtrics looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.