Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.
ForestAdmin vs Sage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ForestAdmin (Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.) and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ForestAdmin (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 33). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ForestAdmin is ahead of Sage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ForestAdmin is clearly ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sage is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ForestAdmin is ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ForestAdmin is ahead of Sage.
ForestAdmin carries 3,415 GitHub stars across 87 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
ForestAdmin is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Sage looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ForestAdmin | Sage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 33 |
| Code | 66 | 56 |
| Education | 74 | 52 |
| Community | 28 | 34 |
| Reach | 35 | 23 |
| Momentum | 27 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,415 | 2,180 |
| Forks | 360 | 430 |
| Public repos | 87 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 14 | 6 |
| External contributors | 9 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 64 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 38 |