ForestAdmin vs The Washington Post

ForestAdmin (Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.) and The Washington Post both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ForestAdmin (rank #165) holds a modest lead over The Washington Post (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 37). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ForestAdmin is ahead of The Washington Post. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ForestAdmin is clearly ahead of The Washington Post. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ForestAdmin is ahead of The Washington Post. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), The Washington Post is ahead of ForestAdmin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ForestAdmin is ahead of The Washington Post.

ForestAdmin carries 3,415 GitHub stars across 87 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors on record. The Washington Post shows 2,751 stars across 91 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

ForestAdmin is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. The Washington Post looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.