ForestAdmin vs Wrike

ForestAdmin (Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ForestAdmin (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 34). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ForestAdmin is ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ForestAdmin is ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ForestAdmin is ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wrike is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin.

ForestAdmin carries 3,415 GitHub stars across 87 public repos, with 14 repositories active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ForestAdmin's footprint is roughly 12.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ForestAdmin is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.