Formbricks vs Iterable

Formbricks (Open Source Qualtrics Alternative) and Iterable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Formbricks (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Iterable (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 44). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formbricks is slightly ahead of Iterable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Formbricks is slightly ahead of Iterable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formbricks is ahead of Iterable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Formbricks is ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is clearly ahead of Formbricks.

Formbricks carries 12,675 GitHub stars across 18 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Iterable shows 269 stars across 100 public repos, 16 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Formbricks's footprint is roughly 47.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Formbricks is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Iterable looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.