Open Source Qualtrics Alternative
Formbricks vs Moodle Development
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Formbricks (Open Source Qualtrics Alternative) and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formbricks (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 34). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formbricks is ahead of Moodle Development. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Formbricks is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formbricks is slightly ahead of Moodle Development. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Formbricks is ahead of Moodle Development. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formbricks is ahead of Moodle Development.
Formbricks carries 12,675 GitHub stars across 18 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,353 stars across 15 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors.
Formbricks is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Moodle Development makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Formbricks | Moodle Development |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #602 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 34 |
| Code | 53 | 43 |
| Education | 67 | 45 |
| Community | 47 | 39 |
| Reach | 36 | 26 |
| Momentum | 24 | 13 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 12,675 | 7,353 |
| Forks | 2,459 | 8,234 |
| Public repos | 18 | 15 |
| Active repos (90d) | 9 | 4 |
| External contributors | 6 | 25 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 25 |