Open Source Qualtrics Alternative
Formbricks vs Softr
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Formbricks (Open Source Qualtrics Alternative) and Softr (Softr Platforms GmbH) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formbricks (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Softr (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 39). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formbricks is clearly ahead of Softr. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Formbricks is slightly ahead of Softr. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formbricks is ahead of Softr. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Softr is slightly ahead of Formbricks.
Formbricks carries 12,675 GitHub stars across 18 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Softr shows 1 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Formbricks's footprint is roughly 12675.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Formbricks is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Softr looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Formbricks | Softr |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #237 | #455 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 48 | 39 |
| Code | 53 | 27 |
| Education | 67 | 66 |
| Community | 47 | 33 |
| Reach | 36 | 40 |
| Momentum | 24 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 12,675 | 1 |
| Forks | 2,459 | 2 |
| Public repos | 18 | 2 |
| Active repos (90d) | 9 | 1 |
| External contributors | 6 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 35 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 10 |