Formbricks vs Workable

Formbricks (Open Source Qualtrics Alternative) and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Formbricks (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 35). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formbricks is slightly ahead of Workable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Formbricks is ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formbricks is clearly ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is slightly ahead of Formbricks. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Workable is slightly ahead of Formbricks.

Formbricks carries 12,675 GitHub stars across 18 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Formbricks's footprint is roughly 16.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Formbricks is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Workable looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.