Formspark vs Getty Images
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Formspark and Getty Images both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formspark (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Getty Images (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 31). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formspark is ahead of Getty Images. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Formspark is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formspark is ahead of Getty Images. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Getty Images is clearly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formspark is clearly ahead of Getty Images.
Formspark carries 67 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Getty Images shows 951 stars across 32 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Getty Images's footprint is roughly 14.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Formspark is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Getty Images looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Formspark | Getty Images |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 31 |
| Code | 59 | 46 |
| Education | 68 | 61 |
| Community | 31 | 20 |
| Reach | 0 | 28 |
| Momentum | 48 | 15 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 67 | 951 |
| Forks | 93 | 497 |
| Public repos | 8 | 32 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 5 |
| External contributors | 2 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 22 |