Formspark vs GoCardless
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Formspark and GoCardless both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formspark and GoCardless sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (42), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formspark is ahead of GoCardless. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Formspark is ahead of GoCardless. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), GoCardless is slightly ahead of Formspark. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), GoCardless is ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), GoCardless is ahead of Formspark.
Formspark carries 67 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. GoCardless shows 6,977 stars across 161 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but GoCardless's footprint is roughly 104.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Formspark is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. GoCardless looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Formspark | GoCardless |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 42 |
| Code | 59 | 49 |
| Education | 68 | 54 |
| Community | 31 | 33 |
| Reach | 0 | 12 |
| Momentum | 48 | 60 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 67 | 6,977 |
| Forks | 93 | 1,173 |
| Public repos | 8 | 161 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 19 |
| External contributors | 2 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 38 |