Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Formspark vs Lansweeper NV

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Formspark and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Formspark (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 30). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formspark is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Formspark is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formspark is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formspark is ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Formspark carries 67 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Formspark is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricFormsparkLansweeper NV
Ranking
Overall rank#372#728
Pillars
Overall4230
Code590
Education6860
Community310
Reach050
Momentum4828
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars670
Forks930
Public repos80
Active repos (90d)80
External contributors20
Avg polish530
Avg AI-readiness350

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Formspark developer profileView Lansweeper NV developer profile