Formspark vs Lodgify
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Formspark and Lodgify both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formspark (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Lodgify (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 30). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formspark is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Formspark is slightly ahead of Lodgify. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formspark is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lodgify is slightly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formspark is ahead of Lodgify.
Formspark carries 67 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Lodgify shows 13 stars across 16 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Formspark's footprint is roughly 5.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Formspark is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lodgify looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Formspark | Lodgify |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 30 |
| Code | 59 | 36 |
| Education | 68 | 65 |
| Community | 31 | 8 |
| Reach | 0 | 7 |
| Momentum | 48 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 67 | 13 |
| Forks | 93 | 76 |
| Public repos | 8 | 16 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 3 |
| External contributors | 2 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 35 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 24 |