Formspark vs Miro
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Formspark and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formspark (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 38). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formspark is slightly ahead of Miro. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is ahead of Formspark. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formspark is clearly ahead of Miro.
Formspark carries 67 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Miro's footprint is roughly 12.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Formspark is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Formspark | Miro |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 38 |
| Code | 59 | 58 |
| Education | 68 | 86 |
| Community | 31 | 32 |
| Reach | 0 | 0 |
| Momentum | 48 | 8 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 67 | 843 |
| Forks | 93 | 380 |
| Public repos | 8 | 45 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 4 |
| External contributors | 2 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 65 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 32 |