Formspark vs Skyscanner

Formspark and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a narrow lead over Formspark (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 42). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Formspark. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Formspark. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is ahead of Formspark. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formspark is slightly ahead of Skyscanner.

Formspark carries 67 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 121.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Formspark is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Skyscanner looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.