Formspark vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Formspark and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Formspark (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 42). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is slightly ahead of Formspark. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is slightly ahead of Formspark. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formspark is ahead of Zammad.
Formspark carries 67 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 95.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Formspark is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Formspark | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 52 |
| Code | 59 | 63 |
| Education | 68 | 71 |
| Community | 31 | 70 |
| Reach | 0 | 0 |
| Momentum | 48 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 67 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 93 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 8 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 9 |
| External contributors | 2 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 35 |