Formspark vs Zapier
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Formspark and Zapier both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zapier (rank #27) holds a meaningful lead over Formspark (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (64 vs 42). The gap of 22 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zapier is ahead of Formspark. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zapier is slightly ahead of Formspark. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zapier is slightly ahead of Formspark. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zapier is clearly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zapier is slightly ahead of Formspark.
Formspark carries 67 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zapier shows 6,768 stars across 296 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zapier's footprint is roughly 101.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Formspark is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Zapier looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Formspark | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #27 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 64 |
| Code | 59 | 68 |
| Education | 68 | 73 |
| Community | 31 | 37 |
| Reach | 0 | 63 |
| Momentum | 48 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 67 | 6,768 |
| Forks | 93 | 1,358 |
| Public repos | 8 | 296 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 13 |
| External contributors | 2 | 23 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 79 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 43 |