Engineering at Fullstory vs LinkedIn

Engineering at Fullstory (Fullstory APIs and Open-Source Projects) and LinkedIn both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

LinkedIn (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Engineering at Fullstory (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LinkedIn is ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Engineering at Fullstory is ahead of LinkedIn. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory.

Engineering at Fullstory carries 19,439 GitHub stars across 63 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. LinkedIn shows 77,785 stars across 137 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LinkedIn's footprint is roughly 4.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Engineering at Fullstory is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. LinkedIn looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.