Engineering at Fullstory vs Matomo Analytics

Engineering at Fullstory (Fullstory APIs and Open-Source Projects) and Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Engineering at Fullstory (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Matomo Analytics is slightly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Engineering at Fullstory is ahead of Matomo Analytics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory.

Engineering at Fullstory carries 19,439 GitHub stars across 63 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Matomo Analytics shows 30,600 stars across 90 public repos, 46 active in the last 90 days and 34 external contributors.

Engineering at Fullstory is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Matomo Analytics looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.