Engineering at Fullstory vs Open edX

Engineering at Fullstory (Fullstory APIs and Open-Source Projects) and Open edX (The community-driven, open-source project powering edX.org and thousands of other online education sites around the world.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Open edX (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Engineering at Fullstory (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 33). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Open edX is clearly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Engineering at Fullstory is ahead of Open edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Engineering at Fullstory is ahead of Open edX. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Open edX is ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Open edX is clearly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory.

Engineering at Fullstory carries 19,439 GitHub stars across 63 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Open edX shows 10,654 stars across 186 public repos, 100 active in the last 90 days and 91 external contributors.

Engineering at Fullstory is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Open edX looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.