Engineering at Fullstory vs Starling Bank

Engineering at Fullstory (Fullstory APIs and Open-Source Projects) and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Engineering at Fullstory and Starling Bank sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Engineering at Fullstory is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is ahead of Engineering at Fullstory.

Engineering at Fullstory carries 19,463 GitHub stars across 64 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Engineering at Fullstory's footprint is roughly 99.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Engineering at Fullstory is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.