Gainsight vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gainsight and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Gainsight (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 36). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Jamf is slightly ahead of Gainsight. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is clearly ahead of Gainsight. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is ahead of Gainsight. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is ahead of Gainsight.
Gainsight carries 5 GitHub stars across 6 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 1589.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Gainsight is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Jamf looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gainsight | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 40 |
| Code | 25 | 33 |
| Education | 42 | 68 |
| Community | 41 | 41 |
| Reach | 28 | 44 |
| Momentum | 52 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 10 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 6 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 20 |
| External contributors | 3 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 28 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 20 | 21 |