Gainsight vs Razorpay
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gainsight and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over Gainsight (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 36). The gap of 27 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Gainsight. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Razorpay is ahead of Gainsight. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Gainsight. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Gainsight. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is ahead of Gainsight.
Gainsight carries 5 GitHub stars across 6 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 762.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Gainsight is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Razorpay looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gainsight | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #30 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 63 |
| Code | 25 | 68 |
| Education | 42 | 53 |
| Community | 41 | 44 |
| Reach | 28 | 58 |
| Momentum | 52 | 71 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5 | 3,811 |
| Forks | 10 | 1,932 |
| Public repos | 6 | 177 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 38 |
| External contributors | 3 | 32 |
| Avg polish | 28 | 69 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 20 | 49 |