Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.
Stream vs HubSpot
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and HubSpot both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
HubSpot (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Stream (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 44). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stream is ahead of HubSpot. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stream is slightly ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stream is ahead of HubSpot. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Stream. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is clearly ahead of HubSpot.
Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. HubSpot shows 53,481 stars across 381 public repos, 35 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors.
Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. HubSpot looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Stream | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #93 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 56 |
| Code | 64 | 55 |
| Education | 54 | 52 |
| Community | 49 | 35 |
| Reach | 23 | 95 |
| Momentum | 82 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 35,664 | 53,481 |
| Forks | 5,186 | 6,864 |
| Public repos | 487 | 381 |
| Active repos (90d) | 84 | 35 |
| External contributors | 44 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 37 |