Stream vs jotform

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and jotform (Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Stream (rank #337) holds a modest lead over jotform (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stream is ahead of jotform. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stream is ahead of jotform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stream is clearly ahead of jotform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), jotform is ahead of Stream. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is clearly ahead of jotform.

Stream carries 35,577 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 90 repositories active in the last 90 days and 42 external contributors on record. jotform shows 1,105 stars across 32 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stream's footprint is roughly 32.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. jotform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.