Stream vs Lansweeper NV

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Stream (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 30). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stream is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of Stream. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stream is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Stream. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.