Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Stream vs LinkedIn

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and LinkedIn both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Stream (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over LinkedIn (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stream is slightly ahead of LinkedIn. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Stream. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is clearly ahead of LinkedIn.

Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. LinkedIn shows 77,785 stars across 137 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors.

Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. LinkedIn looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricStreamLinkedIn
Ranking
Overall rank#317#338
Pillars
Overall4443
Code6463
Education5454
Community4949
Reach2361
Momentum8237
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars35,66477,785
Forks5,18612,231
Public repos487137
Active repos (90d)8428
External contributors4452
Avg polish7464
Avg AI-readiness4743

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Stream developer profileView LinkedIn developer profile