Stream vs Moodle Development

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Stream (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Moodle Development (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 34). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stream is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stream is ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stream is ahead of Moodle Development. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Moodle Development is slightly ahead of Stream. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is clearly ahead of Moodle Development.

Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,353 stars across 15 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stream's footprint is roughly 4.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Moodle Development looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.