Stream vs Open edX

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and Open edX (The community-driven, open-source project powering edX.org and thousands of other online education sites around the world.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Stream (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Open edX (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 42). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Open edX is slightly ahead of Stream. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stream is ahead of Open edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Open edX is slightly ahead of Stream. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Stream is ahead of Open edX. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is ahead of Open edX.

Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. Open edX shows 10,654 stars across 186 public repos, 100 active in the last 90 days and 91 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stream's footprint is roughly 3.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Open edX looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.