Stream vs ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (Open, federated file sync & share. The original Enterprise File Sync and Share. AI-contributions welcome.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company (rank #165) holds a narrow lead over Stream (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 44). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is ahead of Stream. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is clearly ahead of Stream. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company is slightly ahead of Stream.

Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company shows 18,930 stars across 178 public repos, 100 active in the last 90 days and 35 external contributors.

Stream is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. ownCloud - a Kiteworks Company looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.