Stream vs Swiggy

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Stream (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Swiggy (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 32). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stream is clearly ahead of Swiggy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Swiggy is slightly ahead of Stream. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stream is ahead of Swiggy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Stream is slightly ahead of Swiggy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is clearly ahead of Swiggy.

Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. Swiggy shows 314 stars across 22 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stream's footprint is roughly 113.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Swiggy looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.