Stream vs Wrike

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Stream (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 34). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stream is ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is clearly ahead of Stream. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stream is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Stream is slightly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is clearly ahead of Wrike.

Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stream's footprint is roughly 129.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.