Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Stream vs Zulip

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Stream (Build scalable in-app chat, feeds, and live video with AI moderation capabilities in hours, not weeks.) and Zulip (Organized team chat) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Stream (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Zulip (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 36). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stream is slightly ahead of Zulip. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stream is slightly ahead of Zulip. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zulip is slightly ahead of Stream. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stream is clearly ahead of Zulip.

Stream carries 35,664 GitHub stars across 487 public repos, with 84 repositories active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors on record. Zulip shows 32,299 stars across 67 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 76 external contributors.

Stream is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zulip looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricStreamZulip
Ranking
Overall rank#317#536
Pillars
Overall4436
Code6464
Education5449
Community4947
Reach2325
Momentum8238
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars35,66432,299
Forks5,18614,237
Public repos48767
Active repos (90d)849
External contributors4476
Avg polish7467
Avg AI-readiness4738

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Stream developer profileView Zulip developer profile