Getty Images vs sendinblue (now Brevo)
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Getty Images and sendinblue (now Brevo) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
sendinblue (now Brevo) (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Getty Images (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 31). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), sendinblue (now Brevo) is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), sendinblue (now Brevo) is ahead of Getty Images. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Getty Images is slightly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), sendinblue (now Brevo) is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Getty Images is ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo).
Getty Images carries 951 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. sendinblue (now Brevo) shows 653 stars across 37 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Getty Images is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. sendinblue (now Brevo) looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Getty Images | sendinblue (now Brevo) |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 42 |
| Code | 46 | 47 |
| Education | 61 | 76 |
| Community | 20 | 15 |
| Reach | 28 | 31 |
| Momentum | 15 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 951 | 653 |
| Forks | 497 | 328 |
| Public repos | 32 | 37 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 0 |
| External contributors | 2 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 40 |