Getty Images vs UptimeRobot
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Getty Images and UptimeRobot (Leading Uptime Monitoring Service) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
UptimeRobot (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Getty Images (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 31). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Getty Images is slightly ahead of UptimeRobot. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UptimeRobot is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UptimeRobot is ahead of Getty Images. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UptimeRobot is clearly ahead of Getty Images.
Getty Images carries 951 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. UptimeRobot shows 81 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Getty Images's footprint is roughly 11.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Getty Images is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UptimeRobot looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Getty Images | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 37 |
| Code | 46 | 38 |
| Education | 61 | 62 |
| Community | 20 | 35 |
| Reach | 28 | 28 |
| Momentum | 15 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 951 | 81 |
| Forks | 497 | 24 |
| Public repos | 32 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 6 |
| External contributors | 2 | 10 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 37 |