Getty Images vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Getty Images and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
UXPin (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Getty Images (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 31). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Getty Images is ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Getty Images is slightly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is ahead of Getty Images. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UXPin is ahead of Getty Images.
Getty Images carries 951 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Getty Images is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Getty Images | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 35 |
| Code | 46 | 30 |
| Education | 61 | 66 |
| Community | 20 | 13 |
| Reach | 28 | 39 |
| Momentum | 15 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 951 | 879 |
| Forks | 497 | 117 |
| Public repos | 32 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 3 |
| External contributors | 2 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 21 |